The proposed rule change has been met with widespread derision. But MLB has two teams in temporary homes and an avalanche of pitcher injuries
The first time I saw a mention of a baseball “golden at-bat” came on Monday. A few entries flashed on X, my spam detector dismissed them immediately and I moved on in search of my next distraction. A day later, I was back wasting life away on social media and there it was again: the “golden-at bat”. The internet had won: I did a little research.
Multiple entries described a potential rule change in Major League Baseball that would allow a team to send their preferred player to the plate, at any time, even if it wasn’t his turn to hit, once a game. I resisted asking the universe the myriad questions which sprung to mind, such as, what happens if that “golden” player is already on base? This was obviously a gag. Such a rule change wouldn’t be a slight adjustment to how the sport is played: we’re not talking about ads on uniforms or even ghost runners helping to decide extra inning slogs. A golden at-bat? That instantly transforms the game into a different code entirely, at least for me. I’m still not buying it.
About Author
More Stories
NFL hall of famer Shannon Sharpe accused of rape in Nevada lawsuit
Wisden calls World Test Championship a ‘shambles’ and makes case for reform
‘A total embarrassment’: Jamie Vardy says season has been ‘nothing but miserable’