Court finds Salvatore Vasta is immune from a civil suit and that the guards and security officers are not liable
Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updatesGet our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcast
A judge who wrongly jailed a father-of-two during routine divorce proceedings should be protected from any personal consequences for his actions, the high court has ruled, despite the episode being described as an “affront to justice” and a “parody”.
The high court’s ruling on Wednesday restores broad-based protections to all federal judges and shields them from being sued for wrong decisions, and overturns a 2023 decision that shook Australia’s legal fraternity and prompted urgent calls for reform.
Sign up for Guardian Australia’s breaking news email
More Stories
US and UK refuse to sign Paris summit declaration on ‘inclusive’ AI
Why Trump blinked before imposing his ‘beautiful’ tariffs on Canada and Mexico
Campaigner for migrants in Libya targeted in spyware attack