Boycott would aim to use consumer power to pressure company to negotiate its first union contract
Calls for a consumer boycott of Starbucks are growing amid mounting criticism of the coffee chain’s aggressive union-busting activities.
A boycott, supporters say, would aim to use consumer power to pressure Starbucks to stop its union-busting and illegal actions and to finally negotiate its first union contract.
More Stories
In the red: global wine sales fall to lowest levels since 1961
ECB cuts rates for third time this year as Europe braces for Trump tariffs
Uyghur rights group calls on hotel chains not to ‘sanitise’ China abuses in Xinjiang