Sholto David has flagged thousands of papers, most because of concerns over potential image manipulation
When Sholto David quit his job last autumn he could have looked for another post, taken time out to travel, or grabbed his tent and hopped on his bike. But David, a biologist living in Pontypridd, Wales, threw his efforts into a somewhat obscure hobby: finding flaws in scientific papers and doing his best to have them rectified.
The work, David says, is largely thankless. Academics often got defensive about their studies or refused to respond to his criticisms. Journal editors took a similar tack, ignoring his letters, rejecting them, or investigating on timescales bordering on the glacial.
About Author
More Stories
Weight-loss jabs may be good for mental health, research shows
Australia has been hesitant – but could robots soon be delivering your pizza?
AI firms warned to calculate threat of super intelligence or risk it escaping human control