Ralph Babet and Clive Palmer lose case against AEC, which is following precedent by counting ticks but disregarding crosses in upcoming vote
Voice referendum explainer; latest voice poll results; help us monitor ads and misinformationGet our morning and afternoon news emails, free app or daily news podcast
Ticks on the voice referendum ballot paper will count as yes votes while crosses will be invalid, the federal court has ruled, rejecting a challenge brought by United Australia party senator Ralph Babet and Clive Palmer.
On Wednesday Justice Steven Rares ruled in favour of the Australian Electoral Commission, rejecting an argument from Babet and Palmer’s lawyers that ticks should also be invalid if crosses are not accepted as valid no votes.
About Author
More Stories
As cyberwarfare threat looms, cashless Nordic nations go back to banknotes | Miranda Bryant
Trump and Putin expected to speak this week about ceasefire terms, envoy says
‘All the birds returned’: How a Chinese project led the way in water and soil conservation