Trial-monitoring committee in Dakota Access lawsuit have shared concerns of judicial bias and due-process violations
More than half the jurors selected to hear a case brought by a major energy company against Greenpeace have ties to the fossil fuel industry, and most had negative views of anti-pipeline protests or groups that oppose the use of fossil fuels.
The closely watched trial against Greenpeace in Mandan, North Dakota, showcased the difficulty in seating a jury in oil country, where many make their living in the industry. Greenpeace again on Wednesday sought to move the trial to another venue in the state.
About Author
More Stories
Qantas posts $1.39bn profit as holidaymakers flock to Jetstar
‘They’ve lost my trust’: consumers shun companies as bosses kowtow to Trump
#AltGov: the secret network of federal workers resisting Doge from the inside