Ignoring ChatGPT and its cousins won’t get us anywhere. In fact, these systems reveal issues we too often miss
In my spring lecture course of 120 students, my teaching assistants caught four examples of students using artificial-intelligence-driven language programs like ChatGPT to complete short essays. In each case, the students confessed to using such systems and agreed to rewrite the assignments themselves.
With all the panic about how students might use these systems to get around the burden of actually learning, we often forget that as of 2023, the systems don’t work well at all. It was easy to spot these fraudulent essays. They contained spectacular errors. They used text that did not respond to the prompt we had issued to students. Or they just sounded unlike what a human would write.
About Author
More Stories
Walking with breaks might use more energy, but dogs can’t stand it
Sweden warns of heightened risk of Russian sabotage
Pushing Buttons: Is there even any point in making more powerful games consoles?