High court rules there is insufficient new evidence of causal link between hormone-based test and birth defects
• What is Primodos and why was there a court case?
An attempt by more than 100 UK families to seek compensation for birth defects they say were caused by the hormone-based pregnancy test Primodos has been struck out by the high court.
The families, who believe their babies suffered a range of congenital abnormalities due to the drug, were hoping to rekindle a civil case against the manufacturer after a previous attempt collapsed in 1982. However, Mrs Justice Yip ruled that there was insufficient new evidence to demonstrate a causal link between the tests, which were used until the 1970s, and congenital malformations, and that as a result the families did not have a realistic chance of succeeding in their claim.
More Stories
Friendship, fitness and freedom: why LGBTQ+ Australians are turning to sports clubs to find ‘queer joy’
My partner and I argue constantly – and she puts all the blame on me | Ask Annalisa Barbieri
Cycling to school almost became extinct – until one man revived the bike bus