World’s biggest social media firms challenge state laws blocking them from moderating certain content or banning users
Members of the United States supreme court expressed skepticism regarding two laws being debated in oral arguments on Monday, both of which deal with how social media platforms moderate content and could have broad implications for freedom of speech online.
Filed by NetChoice, an association representing the world’s largest social media firms, both cases challenge state laws blocking social media platforms from moderating certain user content or banning users. Arguments on Monday lasted longer than many experts anticipated, extending into a marathon four-hour session.
About Author
More Stories
Osamu Suzuki obituary
How could Trump’s second term affect DEI initiatives in the US?
Americans stocking up on foreign goods before Trump tariffs: ‘a sense of urgency’